Both are distinct from Adobe's, GIMP's, ImageMagick's, etc. Each camera and image manipulation software package uses a custom "quantization table" that says how a block of pixels will be encoded. But they're still detectable to someone looking for them. Messing with JPEG and TIFF formats is technically much more difficult, but in the real world would probably do a better job of remaining hidden. Show them how LSB messes with GIF images, then show them a reduced palette image followed by the same image with an LSB stego message. Then show them how a photo of a forest of autumn leaves or a field of wheat makes the effects of LSB stego almost invisible. You can show them a photo of a clear blue sky over the ocean, then mar the top third with an LSB stego message. You can show them a before and after picture. Using LSB on an ordinary GIF would give you crazy incorrect colors, but you could use a modified palette with 128 duplicated colors to hide the data invisibly.īoth of these are easy experiments to perform and demonstrate to an audience. Also, BMPs may themselves be suspicious, as most people use compressed formats such as JPG or PNG. If the message is short and modifies only the first half of the picture, the top of the image will have a "static" appearance that magically cleans up in the bottom half. For one thing, it works directly on bitmaps, but not compressed images. LSB is often used in stego demonstrations because it's a simple and understandable example of the idea, but it has a lot of weaknesses that make it less than perfect for real world use. Data can hide wherever information moves, including audio files, DNS requests, TCP port knocking, error codes, URLs, Unicode, spam, anywhere. Return Uri.encodeComponent(url).I'm assuming you're referring only to static image manipulation, as that's the common fear these days (terrorists are hiding data in eBay images!) But it's a mistake to think that images are the only potential carriers of hidden data. (DateTime.now().millisecondsSinceEpoch / 1000).round().toString() įinal nonce = "N$" įinal contentHash = _getMd5HashInBase64FromJson(inputJsonContent) įinal signature = "$appId$method$url$seconds$nonce$contentHash" įinal signatureHmacHashBase64 = _getHmacHashInBase64FromString(appSecrets, signature) įinal token = "$appId:$signatureHmacHashBase64:$nonce:$seconds" String final String final dynamic final String final String appSecrets, Import 'package:flutter/foundation.dart' I had to sign a request with hmac for calling an API in my recent project. I also tried this, but I am not sure if this is correct var message_byte = UTF8.encode(message) However, the method "add" does not exist any more in the Hmac class. I found some old example code which looks like the following var message_byte = UTF8.encode(message) Here is what I tried with dart: // DART CODEīut then I don't know how to go on. Signature_b64 = signature.digest().encode('base64').rstrip('\n') Signature = hmac.new(secret_b64, message, hashlib.sha256) In python, I could do it with the following code: # PYTHON CODE I try to generate a sha256 HMAC using a base64-decoded secret key on a message.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |